From: "Bartosz Dziewoński" <matma.rex@...>
Date: 2011-10-05T23:24:42+09:00
Subject: Re: ERB or Haml?

How about Markaby? It's a bit like Haml and I, for one, like
understanding what will happen without learning quirks of yet another
syntax.

2011/10/5, Nation, Carey <Carey.Nation@turner.com>:
> No experience with erb (or haml in ruby, either), but I've used scalatra
> (Sinatra for scala) and it uses a flavor of haml (scaml). Man, that
> sentence looks like lisp.  Anyway, I really like haml.  It is very
> terse, very light.  I like that the understand that the world is made of
> div's and make it very clean to declare them. For all that I know, ERB
> might do the same.
>
> Anyway, of all of the frameworks and such that I've used/played with, I
> like this best...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Cheek [mailto:josh.cheek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:56 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: ERB or Haml?
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders
> <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ERB or Haml?
>>
>> Vote here: http://t.co/5ju0pssY
>>
>
> Depends, I use both on my site.
>
> Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml
> only renders HTML.
>
>


-- 
-- Matma Rex