From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2011-09-13T08:26:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Any downsides to writing paranthesises?

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:41:41AM +0900, Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski wrote:
>=20
> Personally I find parentheseless code just as easy to read as
> parenthesized one (even easier, in some cases, when you'd have to nest
> parens three-deep...) and much easier to write.

Err . . . just a note:

"Parenthesis" is singular, and plural is "parentheses".  "Parenthesises"
is not correct pluralization, though it is a third-person present form of
parenthesise, the British spelling of parethesize.  Thus, what you said
probably should have been "parenthesisless" (not parentheseless), and
what the originator of this thread said should have been "parentheses"
(not parenthesises).

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5ukGEACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXzhACgzMElFNtoX6UaQzcsKMzTa0Dg
RWYAoPGqUaTFpqONFHYAavmJW9eLbe4U
=KX89
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--