From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...>
Date: 2002-04-21T11:16:39+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby on .NET?

For you and everyone else interested in this thread, I highly suggest
you re-read the previous massive threads on Ruby and .NET.  A lot of it
is explained there, in more detail than I'm qualified to provide.  ^,^

On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 08:30, Stefan Matthias Aust wrote:
> "Sean Middleditch" <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> schrieb
> 
> > Ruby does offer advantages, just not in the areas C# is strong.  For
> > example, it's been stated here before that RUby can't be JIT'd like C#
> > cn, for various reasons.
> 
> I haven't seen those arguments, but I'm pretty sure that Ruby of course
> could be JIT'd (while that would be a little bit more difficult that a JIT
> for Java or C#).  Languages like Smalltalk or SELF are typically JIT'd and
> both could be used to efficiently implement Ruby.  So the statement should
> be, Ruby isn't JIT'd (at the moment).
> 
> bye
> --
> Stefan Matthias Aust   //
> www.3plus4software.de // Inter Deum Et Diabolum Semper Musica Est
> 
>