From: Denis Defreyne Date: 2011-07-27T02:35:33+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] nanoc 3.2, a DRY static web site generator Hi, 1) About the colorize_syntax filter documentation (and others): The documentation for the various filters can be found in the API documentation section. For example, the colorize_syntax filter is documented at . It is linked to from the manual, too. Go to the Filters section, then click on the `colorize_syntax` link, and you’ll end up in the same page. 2) About getting pygmentize (and calls to other executables) to work on Windows: For nanoc 3.2 I am using systemu (http://rubydoc.info/gems/systemu/file/README) which should work on all platforms. Several people use nanoc on Windows, so Windows is a supported platform which means that if you find issues, do report them! 3) About the benefits of nanoc over Jekyll: I have not used Jekyll myself (nanoc has been around for longer than Jekyll) so I can only do a comparison based on what other people tell me. (This may not be 100% accurate, so by all means correct me if I am wrong!) Jekyll focuses on simplicity. It was created to power GitHub pages, and since Jekyll sites are compiled on the GitHub servers, their functionality needs to be restricted (which means, for example, that you cannot use ERB). nanoc, on the other hand, focuses on maximum flexibility. You can build unusual layouts fairly easily, and it is possible to extend nanoc with custom filters, helpers and more. Jekyll and nanoc can coexist. GitHub uses nanoc for their developers section (http://developer.github.com/) even though Jekyll originated at GitHub. The choice between nanoc and Jekyll depends on how much power you need, but it is definitely also a matter of taste. I hope this has been helpful! Cheers, Denis -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.