From: Jim Maher <jdmaher@...>
Date: 2011-07-19T00:45:16+09:00
Subject: Re: What is BasicObject (really)?

John Feminella wrote in post #1011420:
> 1.) Which results seem inconsistent to you?

BasicObject's superclass is nil, yet it is both a kind and instance of
Class.

BasicObject has no ancestors, yet it is a Class (which is an Object,
etc.)


> 2.) What code did you write to produce those results?

Code attached.

Attachments:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/6429/BasicObject_identity.rb


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.