From: serialhex <serialhex@...>
Date: 2011-06-30T03:25:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Initial RVM Ruby when starting a shell; using system Ruby with RVM

--90e6ba3fcd9bd0fc2604a6dde95a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Eric,
to set default interpreter use:
rvm --default use 1.9.2 # or whatever

and if you want to use the macruby, then i'm pretty sure you have to switch
to that ruby using `rvm use system` though i'm not on a mac so i can't be
sure about that one. maybe someone else knows??
hex


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eric Christopherson <
echristopherson@gmail.com> wrote:

> [I posted this to the RVM group a few days ago, but haven't heard back.]
>
> I could have sworn that when I first started using RVM (a few months ago),
> each new login shell would activate my default Ruby. But now I see the
> system
> one is active at first. Was I just imagining that the RVM code at the end
> of
> .bashrc activated the default Ruby? Is there a way to make it do so? (I
> just
> read that you shouldn't put 'rvm use ...' in system or profile .rvmrc, so I
> don't want to just add 'rvm use default'.)
>
> Also, I have MacRuby installed outside of RVM. I ran into a problem when I
> installed some gems using macgem; apparently I had a non-system Ruby
> activated, so RVM was telling macgem that my gem dir was an RVM one. Is
> that a
> bug, or do I just have to make sure to do 'rvm use system' before
> interacting
> with non-RVM Rubies?
>
>


-- 
my blog is cooler than yours: serialhex.github.com

> > Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I
> > should use Linux over BSD?
>
> No.  That's it.  The cool name, that is.  We worked very hard on
> creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it
> certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able
> to say "OS/2? Hah.  I've got Linux.  What a cool name".  386BSD made the
> mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the
> name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too
> technical.
	-- Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux

--90e6ba3fcd9bd0fc2604a6dde95a--