From: djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)
Date: 2002-04-17T22:05:29+09:00
Subject: Re: Help wanted for statvfs extension

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote in message news:<200204170445.g3H4j2M32115@sharui.nakada.kanuma.tochigi.jp>...
> Hi,
> 
> At Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:58:45 +0900,
> James F.Hranicky <jfh@cise.ufl.edu> wrote:
> > Statvfs is more-or-less SYSV-specific; under the BSDs it'll be 
> > statfs.
> 
> statvfs() and fstatvfs() are specified in The Single UNIX
> Specification.  I'm afraid statfs() and fstatfs() are less
> portable, maybe.
> 
> > I don't think it should be a subclass of File or File::Stat . 
> 
> Agree.

I knew the BSD's would be an issue.  Should I cross that bridge when I
come to it or should I worry about it now?  One problem - I don't have
access to any BSD machines, so I'm not even sure how the libraries are
set up.  Can this be resolved with some sort of #IFNDEF pragma?

Thanks.

Dan