From: Adam Prescott <adam@...>
Date: 2011-06-20T23:17:51+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@gmail.com> wrote:
> OTOH, require_relative is much more clear as to what it is doing than
> require! would be, amd. anyway, require! is 8 characters, not 7.
>

require_relative is completely fine. There is almost no sensible
discussion here, and certainly not one worth 100+ posts, complete with
people letting Ilias rile them up so that he can truncate text in his
reply, call it babbling and declare the thread closed and "dismiss"
people, like he owns the place, which just further aggravates people.
(Hint: it's intentional. He's being a dick. On purpose.)

If anyone else had posted his original "scenario", I'd bet it would
have been largely ignored.

Can we stop being trolled now? Even if he's somehow not intending to
be a troll, it's all the same up to trolleomorphism.