From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2011-06-18T10:46:01+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:30:32AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>=20
> Unfortunately the general rule for the "!" in the method name, at
> least in the standard library, is that it means "more dangerous than
> the version without bang".  Since require! does not follow this rule,
> and not worthy to change the rule.  So it's no chance to have require!
> in the standard library.

I take it you mean more "dangerous" in terms of the effects on data
manipulated within the program (tendency to corrupt data when used
incautiously, having potentially unexpected side effects, and so on), and
not in terms of the potential dangers outside of the program itself.  Is
that a reasonable assumption?

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk37/8MACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUMNwCgjRYkwyO69S8Q7eoCfzB20b7n
hPoAoJZl54UwtNUVswK/MAug4sebjf8l
=PxZv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--