From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2011-06-18T03:21:00+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:17:50AM +0900, Gary Wright wrote:
>=20
> I can't believe I'm adding to this conversation...=20
>=20
> Ruby already has an idiom for naming two related methods so how about:
>=20
> require "a/b"        # the usual
> require! "a/b"       # require relative to __FILE__=20

I had no idea about "require!".  Thanks for mentioning it.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk37l3cACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKV7bQCgzzSUjf326/qJmxMCsx4MF2zA
wTwAnju8IxYj/CdU0rW2TZ1f9xOZ/2Lw
=ouhl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--