From: David Masover Date: 2011-06-17T15:19:57+09:00 Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 04:51:19 PM Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > On 16 Ιούν, 00:36, David Masover wrote: > [...] > > I've read everything, but I'll not comment. > > Do me a favour, please. Let me think... no. You haven't even been cooperative when I have been trying to give you the best answer to your question, by at least providing enough context so that I understand why it's a real problem. And it gets more personal from there. > Can you please try to find one word (ideally with 7 chars), > independent of you think about the need. > > Just as an exercise. As "just an exercise", it's a pointless waste of time. At best, it might enhance my vocabulary, which doesn't need the help. It also doesn't look like fun. About the only other reason I'd do it as "just an exercise" is as a favor to you, and given your conduct so far, replying to you is already a favor. What I would be happy to do is discuss why this is needed, and how/whether to get it included into the core, or what a good name might be outside of your artificial one-word-7-char constraint. But I'm not going to jump through hoops just because you say so. I'd normally refuse to do so even for people I respect.