From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Date: 2011-06-17T01:55:30+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative

On 16 Éďýí, 19:45, "Matthew K. Williams" <m...@harpstar.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > [...] - (off-context babbing)
>
> This is rude.  You don't have to quote it if you don't want, but calling
> it babbling?  Rude.
>
> > REQUOTE:
>
> > ""require_relative(_to_this_file)" in a single word, ideally with 7
> > chars
>
> > This is the topic.
>
> > Is it really so difficult for you people to solve a given problem,
> > even if you personally don't agree that it is a problem?
> > "
>
> > It seems that it's just to difficult.
>
> You know, this was solved days ago via an alias, but that wasn't good
> enough for you.

alias abcdefg require_relative

This does not solve it, I need the concise word.

> Moreover, you're rude to people.

Of course. I'm rude, and the freak-show that

a) has hijacked the thread at the beginning
b) continues with off-topic comments and start again to become
personal.

those are not rude, but civilized.

> Enough. Killfile time.

At least you know how to use filters.

> Matt

.

--
http://lazaridis.com