From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2011-06-13T00:51:13+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC - One word alias for require_relative



On Jun 12, 11:35 am, Steve Klabnik <st...@steveklabnik.com> wrote:
> Yep, that just re-introduces the security issue that had us remove . from $:
> in the first place.
>
> And I wrote a gem that backports require_relative to 1.8, so you can use it
> everywhere. ;)http://rubygems.org/gems/require_relative

Hompage link seems to be broken

Is this in backports (https://github.com/marcandre/backports), btw?

I'm wondering if I can just start doing 1.9+ only from now on, and if
the end user wants to use my stuff with 1.8.x they can add RUBYOPT="-
rbackports", or something along those lines. Could something like that
do the job?