From: David Masover <ninja@...>
Date: 2011-06-08T14:06:05+09:00
Subject: Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item")

On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:50:33 AM Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> On 7 Ιούν, 18:32, David Masover <ni...@slaphack.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:00:29 AM Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > > On 6 Ιούν, 02:42, David Masover <ni...@slaphack.com> wrote:
> > > > It doesn't seem that "violation" was the primary concern, so much as
> > > > that there wasn't enough reliable information to back it up. If that
> > > > wasn't the case, I have to imagine that "notability" would've kicked
> > > > in.
> > > 
> > > " The article is one of these "I want to attack the guy without
> > > crossing the Wikipedia blatant personnal attack line" "
> > 
> > That was one opinion.
> 
> [...]
> 
> This was the initial deletion reason (and the reality).

Actually, not really. Even in the inital reason (which has no special status 
above the others), we see the actual reason: "In any case, no third-party 
reliable coverage seems to exist on the guy (despite high Ghits of course) so 
there's really nothing to build an article from."

Exactly one other comment mentions this being an attack. There's another one 
that's vague, and another two for "keep", one which says: "The article's tone 
isn’t vengeful or accusing either. If Paris Hilton has an article, then why 
not Ilias?"

Maybe it was the reality, but I can't tell from looking at that deletion 
decision, though I agree with the decision on other grounds. (There's all 
sorts of reliable sources for information about Paris Hilton, and like her or 
not, she's notable.)

> [...]
> aborted reading (It's just too much babbling).

Called it. Plenty of time, but no patience.

Still odd to see a TL;DR on ruby-talk, though.