From: spiralofhope <spiralofhope_rubyml@...>
Date: 2011-05-21T03:24:39+09:00
Subject: Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation.

On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:34:46 +0900
Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Otherwise, I guess ruby is not the language for you. For those who
> > need to write programs using formal methods or safety-critical
> > systems I'd say it's definitely not. But many of us use it because
> > ruby helps us write useful applications quickly and enjoyably.
> >
> 
> Why is not suitable for safety-critical systems?

For critical systems, wouldn't the language need to be very carefully
engineered?  Typesafe and all that.  This is one of the things that's
been intriguing me about Mythryl.

http://mythryl.org/



-- 
http://spiralofhope.com