From: Luis Lavena Date: 2011-05-14T00:25:54+09:00 Subject: Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? On May 13, 11:25 am, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > > I agree that RubyGems gets some unwarranted flak, but my point was > that users obviously have a hard time discerning what’s at fault when > an error occurs when installing a gem.  By improving the output of > RubyGems when an error occurs, using information provided with the > gem, such as home page, author, and email address, users will know who > to contact to report said error. > Can you open a feature request for that? http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=578&group_id=126&func=browse Even better if a fork/pull request is done at GitHub: http://github.com/rubygems/rubygems I think is not that hard to implement and for sure can serve better to the user. > > RubyGems takes the error of Make and tells you "there was an error > > with compilation of extension". RubyGems can't guess or determine what > > failed to provide a better error for you, that will be overly > > complicated. > > As OP said, there must be a change in GCC version or even Ruby version > > that could have been the root of this issue. > > No, I said that. > > I don’t understand why I am constantly being misunderstood, but it > seems that I am at fault.  Perhaps I should make my output clearer. Well, some of your answers do not show up in my ruby-talk copy of this thread, so seems is not your fault been misunderstood. -- Luis Lavena