From: David Jacobs <developer@...>
Date: 2011-05-11T21:55:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.3 documentation challenge

That too, but I figured if the goal here was to complete the documentation (instead of revamping it), a complete conversion to Yardoc would be a hard sell. (If that's not the case, I'll be thrilled.)
On Wednesday, 11 May 2011 at 8:53 am, Nikolai Weibull wrote: 
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 14:32, David Jacobs <developer@wit.io> wrote:
> > I'm not sure who makes these decisions for ruby-doc.org, but is there any chance that we could get Yardoc-formatted documentation (or at least a fresh stylesheet for standard rdoc output) this time around?
> > 
> > I'd be very inclined to help out with this effort if I knew the output was going to look fresh and appealing.
> 
> I would appreciate this more for the fact that the syntax is better.
>