From: Chad Perrin Date: 2011-05-05T08:07:07+09:00 Subject: Re: Iterating over an Array of Hashes --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 07:42:58AM +0900, Christopher Dicely wrote: >=20 > Yes, which is why I used the word "indicated" rather than "specified"; > those words have very different meanings. What he specified was "data". Read it again if you like. It was "data", and not "programming abstractions". I'm not aware of any definition of "data" that means "not the actual data, but rather the programming abstractions by which the data is managed". I eagerly await a response from the guy who posed the question. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3B2PgACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUeZQCfTd7yPhNmz9Q89jpO0Q/gtODt b3UAoLh9Ixmh54MPrgOoqZlCtAktLDxQ =E8DA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--