From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2011-04-15T04:19:53+09:00
Subject: Re: Using underscors or camel case for variables and functions (def)

--H8ygTp4AXg6deix2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:11:48AM +0900, Fily Salas wrote:
> I thought you couldn't use camel words in Ruby instead you should use
> underscores but I just tried it and it works.

*Should* is the operative word -- not *must*.


>=20
> Is this valid in Ruby or it works but is not semantically correct?

It works fine.  It's just harder to read at a glance than with
underscores for most contexts with method and variable names.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--H8ygTp4AXg6deix2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2nRcQACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVKuQCeJgxq+xqpo6B856Nrb8iQUdOi
A5oAoJTgpVBAy1wh8Pq+XsIvtsOT+VSz
=R3Tv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--H8ygTp4AXg6deix2--