From: Kevin Date: 2011-04-14T05:34:26+09:00 Subject: Re: functional paradigm taking over --0016e6d96f63c421fd04a0d2bbb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This post was less constructive than any of the others I have seen so far. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:41 PM, serialhex wrote: > > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH= HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!= !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > STOP THE FSCKING FLAME WAR!!!! THIS OT POST HAS BECOME OT FOR ITSELF!!!! > (recursively OT??) i'm sure we all understand that a decently powerful > spreadsheet program can do interesting things. i've heard of people usin= g > them as databases & running a companies banking in excel. but that is no= t > the point. the point is that - like any other flame war - this argument = is > going to get EVERYONE NOWHERE! > > so if you all would please: STOP THIS MADNESS BEFORE YOU BREAK OPEN A RIF= T > AND RELEASE CTHULHU FROM HIS WATERY PRISON AND HE DEVOURS US ALL!!!!!! > > thank you for your time and attention... > hex > > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:18:58AM +0900, Kevin wrote: > > > No a jargon or slang does not put aside the language it exists inside > > > of. To try and argue this is ridiculous, the definitions used within > > > the standard language do not become invalid just because you speak to= a > > > specific group. Now you accuse me of moving the goal posts because I > > > utilize standard as opposed to nonstandard meanings of terminology to > > > point out that one may feel free to call any program a language? A > > > jargon only supersedes the standard usage of a term when it is no > > > longer specific to a single group, at which point it stops being a > > > jargon. > > > > In short . . . yes, you're saying that driving a nail is the same as > > driving a car. When I ask "Can you drive?" and you say "Yes," thinking > > you know how to pound nails into wood, you think I should loan you my > > car. > > > > You give a whole new meaning to the comment that when all you have is a > > hammer, everything looks like a nail. I am not, however, inclined to l= et > > you pound the crap out of my car with a hammer. > > > > By the way . . . the way you want to use "programming language" is > > definitely the nonstandard usage in this context. Context matters. > > > > -- > > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > > > --0016e6d96f63c421fd04a0d2bbb6--