From: Adam Prescott Date: 2011-03-14T09:00:48+09:00 Subject: Re: send() with a block? --e0cb4e6ff21d7d0d9e049e65f505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: > I agree that the documentation the original post linked to really > should mention that if any block is passed to send, the block is > passed on to the method invoked. > Based on Robert's code, isn't this false, with it being a feature of super and not send? --e0cb4e6ff21d7d0d9e049e65f505--