From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>
Date: 2011-01-20T02:16:59+09:00
Subject: Re: Why Quby? (was Re: What are your ruby rough cuts ?)

--0016e6db29344c93ea049a35cce7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@gmail.com>wrote:

> Scheme (which, I think, is where Ruby got the specific notational
> convention for marking "dangerous" methods) comes much closer to
> meeting this description than Ruby does.
>

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Scheme uses this notation for
destructive assignments, not state mutations.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
Medioh! Kudelski

--0016e6db29344c93ea049a35cce7--