From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2011-01-18T18:29:47+09:00
Subject: Re: The most recommended way of naming methods in Ruby

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Edmond Kachale
<edmond.kachale@baobabhealth.org> wrote:

> What is the most recommended (or the conventional) way of naming methods in
> Ruby? Do they need to be verb-like or noun-like? In other language like C++,
> methods are supposed to be verbs because they are dimmed as messages sent to
> the object. I have asked this because methods in Ruby are also objects.

Not exactly.  There was a lengthy discussion here about whether
methods are objects or not.  Strictly speaking they are not, but you
can obtain an object representing a bound or unbound method.

> *I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year 2011!!**

ed.update_signature!

Cheers

robert


-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/