From: Stu <stu@...>
Date: 2011-01-15T08:57:11+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] JRuby 1.6.0.RC1 released

I agree! I didn't look at the script to see if it had any bashisms.
/bin/sh would definitely be welcome and by all means the most
portable.

btw. /bin/bash definitely screws up rvm installed jruby in freebsd.

example:

%  uname -a
FreeBSD hal9000.rubyprogrammer.net 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #2:
Thu Aug 12 17:55:19 CDT 2010
v0id@hal9000.rubyprogrammer.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAL9000  amd64

%  rvm list

rvm rubies

   ruby-1.8.7-head [ x86_64 ]
=> ruby-1.9.2-head [ x86_64 ]
   rbx-head [ ]
   ree-head [ x86_64 ]
   ree-1.8.7-2010.02 [ x86_64 ]/home/stu/.rvm/scripts/list:
/home/stu/.rvm/rubies/jruby-1.5.5/bin/ruby: /bin/bash: bad
interpreter: No such file or directory

   jruby-1.5.5 [  ]

This is a bug. It should be fixed.

~Stu


On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Oliver Schad
<spam.entfernen.und.bring.gefaelligst.ein.bier.mit@oschad.de> wrote:
> Stu wrote:
>
>> Hey support #!/usr/bin/env bash vs the non portable /bin/bash. not all
>> OSes put bash there.
>
> Not all OS have a bash. /bin/sh is existent per definition and portable.
>
> Regards
> Oli
>
> --
> Man darf ruhig intelligent sein, man muss sich nur zu helfen wissen
>
>