From: avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant)
Date: 2002-04-05T17:53:48+09:00
Subject: Re: OO/Ruby Terminology

Albert Wagner <alwagner@tcac.net> wrote in message news:<20020405005640.RLAI7217.io@there>...
> Sending a message to an object is certainly more OO.

Not to start a holy war about definitions of OO, but those who work in
CLOS or Dylan would certainly disagree with you.

(Personally, I do prefer the message passing paradigm - my favorite
method is method_missing, and ad-hoc polymorhism a la CLOS doesn't
give that to me).