From: Quintus <sutniuq@...>
Date: 2010-12-07T01:49:43+09:00
Subject: Re: lib/ruby/site_ruby vs lib/ruby/vendor_ruby

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 06.12.2010 08:50, schrieb Sniper Abandon:
> What is the difference between  "lib/ruby/site_ruby" vs
> "lib/ruby/vendor_ruby"
> i thing, RubyVM load both libraries (site_ruby and vendor_ruby)
> if yes then , why are they named separately ?
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Thaniyarasu
> Castlerock Research
> 

If you compile and install a C extension without packaging it to a gem,
it goes to site_ruby/ I believe. The vendor_ruby/ directory probably is
for packagers, i.e. persons who provide a Ruby with some extra additions?

Just some thoughts, I don't know for sure.

Vale,
Marvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM/RQIAAoJEGrS0YjAWTKV94kH/3aYmGgulC3ntw5ROFq6p15B
+bdiC7Z3mVObQkKo/SLRC7UrzdXYzkppaNomWqs8QuaOH7sERT4l+leTvKx8qJx0
fb2uliNZThK8RBXqmMWvUCTmkzf/3/MCWs6AQ2d/e1ofwjl2J92ip53xaA4VsxxS
2KFNWF9A0y2P+H8jv7KES3aYnZL0We6SojXUKkgJiqTtVDGLuhPMbAjdQ5cB3w+P
y0KwKvFpHElVFcrw7OT7v1UAkL15D74IVQfV9tgMDVjigb1e5UYWl1qXgPbPdixc
lmwOt1wRat3oFgm6D876R/4jkaH80BgTENA2Lz5ap3621GHCWTsZpAV6R9pu6Sg=
=E29U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----