From: Sam Duncan <sduncan@...>
Date: 2010-11-30T13:36:55+09:00
Subject: Re: RFC Future Ruby hash literal syntax

Oops, just realised I didn't need the x

ruby-1.9.2-p0 > ([1]*3).map! {Object.new}
  => [#<Object:0x00000000a4b848>, #<Object:0x00000000a4b820>, 
#<Object:0x00000000a4b7f8>]

Sam


On 30/11/10 17:20, Sam Duncan wrote:
> ruby-1.9.2-p0 > ([1]*3).map! {|x| Object.new}
>  => [#<Object:0x00000000a12778>, #<Object:0x00000000a12750>, 
> #<Object:0x00000000a12728>]
>
> ??
>
>
> On 30/11/10 16:54, Yossef Mendelssohn wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 9:48 pm, Ryan Davis<ryand-r...@zenspider.com>  wrote:
>>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 19:40 , Yossef Mendelssohn wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 29, 5:31 pm, Ryan Davis<ryand-r...@zenspider.com>  wrote:
>>>>> I think all variants or Array.new are essentially useless and 
>>>>> stick to [] for everything.
>>>> What's your [] equivalent of `Array.new(3) { Thing.new }`?
>>> BenArray.new(3, Thing.new) works great!
>> I've yet to use BenArray, but assuming it follows BenString
>> conventions:
>>
>> >>  Array.new(3, Object.new)
>>    =>  [#<Object:0x51af7c>, #<Object:0x51af7c>, #<Object:0x51af7c>]
>> >>  Array.new(3) { Object.new }
>>    =>  [#<Object:0x5136b4>, #<Object:0x5136a0>, #<Object:0x51363c>]
>>
>> My question still stands.
>>
>> -- 
>> -yossef
>>
>