From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2010-11-25T22:55:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.8 vs 1.9

On Nov 25, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Phillip Gawlowski wrote:

> Thus, UTF-8 is a subset of UTF-16 is a subset of UTF-16. Thus, also,
> the future-proofing, in case even more glyphs are needed.

You are confusing us.

UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32 are encodings of Unicode code points.  They are all capable of representing all code points.  Nothing in this discussion is a subset of anything else.

James Edward Gray II