From: Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>
Date: 2002-04-04T06:38:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Understanding Python

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:52:39AM +0900, David Alan Black wrote:
> > Erm, I read the page, but what was the official reason for rejecting
> > it?  The only not-matter-of-taste point I seemed to find was that more
> > work would be required each time one adds a method to implement that
> > behaviour as well.
> Well, matter-of-taste points count for a lot, if it's Matz's taste
> we're talking about :-)

Yep, no doubt about that!  That's why I'm not too fond of it as an RCR
(I like a clean language at the base too), but I think it is fine in a
separate library.  Since the original poster explicitely aimed at a
functional taste, I think each_send is a good way to go.

Massimiliano