From: Chad Perrin Date: 2010-11-09T02:37:25+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby vs PHP for the web --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:18:24PM +0900, Phillip Gawlowski wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Andola Soft wrote: > > For creating a web application, you need to use ruby on rails and not > > simply ruby. of course you can create application with much less code > > and you don't have to write sql queries as in PHP; database interface > > can be handled with object relational mapping in RoR. >=20 > Correction: You *can* use Rails or any other Ruby-based webframework, > but you don't *have* to, nor do you *need* no. In fact, you do not need any framework at all. Ruby can be run comfortably via CGI, mod_ruby, or eruby, for instance (and I, at least, wouldn't call eruby a "framework"). --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzYM+IACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVmIgCgwrw+/+PAUpKz3i1HK1gGy2eM HWgAn0P7zX9y5q0iwS+9B8jObXrd1jGU =w/wx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--