From: Jose Hales-Garcia <jose.halesgarcia@...>
Date: 2010-11-04T23:43:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby vs PHP for the web

--Apple-Mail-410--810548365
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


On Nov 3, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Ruby Me wrote:

> I am not here to say that PHP is better or the opposite, I am here to
> ask, how web development in Ruby compared to PHP. Does Ruby use the =
same
> tools? for example MySQL and Apache?

I went from PHP to Rails and have never looked back.  I recommend using =
Rails 3.  It easily connects to MySQL and PostgreSQL.  Running =
development code is quick as it comes with a built-in web server and =
database.

I don't know if you're using the Zend framework, but Rails is a MVC =
framework.  Zend's framework is relatively new and came out after I made =
my switch to Rails.  I also haven't compared Rails to Python's Django.  =
I have used WebObjects though, and I find Rails to be extremely elegant =
with respect to that system.

> And the most interesting point, which language can create a web
> application with less code? (I am talking about the languges not the
> frameworks).

Ruby, the language that facilitates Rails and all the other favorite =
frameworks, is unequivocally less code.  It's a big reason why I won't =
go back to PHP.

Jose
.......................................................
Jose Hales-Garcia
UCLA Department of Statistics
jose.halesgarcia@stat.ucla.edu=

--Apple-Mail-410--810548365--