From: Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso@...>
Date: 2002-04-03T09:34:24+09:00
Subject: Re: seeking to understand...

ptkwt@shell1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) writes:

> I guess you're saying that you would have to pass the anon class around 
> and that it would contain your closure function, correct?

You got that right. But as brk@jenkon.com (Bryn Keller??) mentioned,
Python's current lexical closure is more straightforward than Java.

YS.