From: Jonathan Gold <jgold.bg@...>
Date: 2010-10-23T07:25:20+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby compile failing at make ("LIBRUBY_EXTS: command not found")

Brian and others -- I made some progress and think the problem is in
ext/extmk.rb, but won't be able to dive deeper until next week. Will update this
thread when I do, but wanted to thank you for your help so far.

jonathan

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:01:55AM +0900, Jonathan Gold wrote:
> Brian -- I forgot to also give you some other details:
> 
>     $ make -v
>     GNU Make 3.81
>     Copyright (C) 2006  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>     This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
>     There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>     PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> 
>     This program built for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
> 
> and
> 
>     $ gcc -v
>     Using built-in specs.
>     Target: x86_64-amazon-linux
>     Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
>     --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
>     --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
>     --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-libgcj-multifile
>     --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --disable-dssi
>     --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/jre --with-cpu=generic
>     --host=x86_64-amazon-linux
>     Thread model: posix
>     gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
> 
> Not sure whether that will matter too much, but there it is.
> 
> jonathan
> 
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 02:28:42AM +0900, Jonathan Gold wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:25:28PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
> > > Jonathan Gold wrote in post #956225:
> > > > Anyone have any ideas why ruby compile (1.9.1-p430) is failing for me
> > > 
> > > Probably not unless you say something about the environment you're 
> > > building under: operating system, C compiler version etc.
> > 
> > Reasonable point. It's an Amazon Linux image which is by all accounts really
> > Centos (poking around on the box confirms). 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > near what
> > > > appears to be the end:
> > > >
> > > >     making ruby
> > > >     mkmain.sh: line 2: LIBRUBY_EXTS: command not found
> > > 
> > > What shell does your OS have? It's possible that a bash-specific syntax 
> > > is being used here, and you're using a POSIX shell, like ksh or dash. 
> > > That's the case in Ubuntu:
> > > 
> > > $ ls -l /bin/sh
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2010-06-09 16:27 /bin/sh -> dash
> > 
> > I'm using bash.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Having said that, I have the source to ruby-1.9.1-p429 unpacked on my 
> > > machine, where it compiled successfully, and I can't find mkmain.sh 
> > > anywhere. Can you post the first two lines of that file?
> > 
> > Nor can I. I actually did a 'find / -name "mkmain.sh"' as well as searched the
> > centos pkg repos for the file and nothing comes up. My colleague suggested that
> > perhaps mkmain.sh is actually generated by the make process and cleaned up after
> > the error, leaving me no chance to see it. I grepped around in the ruby build
> > dirs for mkmain.sh and only see these references:
> > 
> >     $ find . -type f | xargs grep 'mkmain'./Makefile:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.sh
> >     ./Makefile.in:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.sh
> >     ./win32/Makefile.sub:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.bat
> > 
> > and then searching for the MKMAIN_CMD string:
> > 
> >     $ find . -type f | xargs grep 'MKMAIN_CMD'
> >     ./Makefile:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.sh
> >     ./Makefile.in:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.sh
> >     ./ChangeLog:    * Makefile.in, win32/Makefile.sub (RUNCMD, MKMAIN_CMD):
> >     macros to
> >     ./win32/Makefile.sub:MKMAIN_CMD    = mkmain.bat
> >     ./uncommon.mk:  @$(RUNCMD) $(MKMAIN_CMD) MAKE=$(MAKE)
> >     ./uncommon.mk:exts: $(MKMAIN_CMD)
> >     ./uncommon.mk:$(MKMAIN_CMD): $(MKFILES) incs $(PREP) $(RBCONFIG) $(LIBRUBY) 
> >     ./common.mk:    @$(RUNCMD) $(MKMAIN_CMD) MAKE=$(MAKE)
> >     ./common.mk:exts: $(MKMAIN_CMD)
> >     ./common.mk:$(MKMAIN_CMD): $(MKFILES) incs $(PREP) $(RBCONFIG) $(LIBRUBY) 
> > 
> > but nothing that seems to generate said file that I can tell.
> > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.