From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2010-10-07T09:55:57+09:00
Subject: Re: minitest randomization


On Oct 6, 2010, at 16:11 , Steve Klabnik wrote:

> The best solution would be to make the execution random, but the
> output in order.

that's not a bad idea at all... but it would be DAMN confusing if you did have test order dependency errors but couldn't see why you were getting your failures because they always showed up in sorted order... I'll have to think about that one for a bit.