From: Hagbard Celine <sin3141592@...>
Date: 2010-09-26T00:11:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Defining a class without opening an existent one

Robert Klemme wrote:
> creation of a class with the same name as one of
> the core classes does not seem like a good idea to me - although it's
> certainly possible.  It may cause confusion and it also makes using
> the core class more cumbersome (you need to reference it as ::Array in
> the module and nested classes for example).

That's true but unfortunately `Array` is just the perfect name for my 
class. I rather use MyNamespace::Array and ::Array instead of inventing 
a bad-fitting name for the class.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.