From: David Masover <ninja@...>
Date: 2010-09-14T12:53:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Webbrowser

On Monday, September 13, 2010 08:25:35 pm Guten wrote:
> A web browser developed by Ruby is great.
> we can extend it by ruby, write configuration file by ruby. write add-ons
> by ruby.
> 
> and we should use some existing projects.
> webkit ruby binding or gecko ruby binding
> javascript engine ruby binding

How would this be significantly better than the options we have?

Chrome can be extended in JavaScript, configuration files are in JSON, and 
add-ons are JavaScript. I can understand liking Ruby better, but I don't like 
it better enough to write a whole browser just to avoid JavaScript.