From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2010-09-11T05:56:22+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: home_run 0.9.1 Released

On Sep 10, 1:11 am, Yossef Mendelssohn <ymen...@pobox.com> wrote:

> I'm definitely not one to say that some core classes couldn't use a
> bit of extra niceness (see http://github.com/flogic/timely for a
> related example). But at the same time, I don't think that Rails and
> ActiveSupport are the right places to look for what's necessary for
> Ruby in general.

Wouldn't it be as good a resources as any? I'm sure the timely lib is
too.

I agree these have to be looked at it with a discerning eye. The
question being, what extensions are designed merely for the
convenience of the framework at large, vs what are very general
extensions that have been added to compensate for a clear lack of
capabilities in the language itself.