From: "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
Date: 2010-09-11T00:04:30+09:00
Subject: Re: calling private accessors



>
> in this case, i only want the accessor to be acessible to the class and its
> subclasses, mainly because the subclasses need to be able to override the
> 'storage mechanism' (ie: backing field vs hash or something)... it's a bid
> of an edge-case though :)
>

that is called 'protected' not 'private' - just that change should do
it.

-a