From: James Byrne <byrnejb@...>
Date: 2010-09-03T23:16:02+09:00
Subject: Re: 1.9 require problem

James Byrne wrote:
>
> 
> OK.  This is not good.  If I try to use require_relative I discover that 
> backtracks in the directory tree are ignored.  For instance, given this 
> code:
> 

Now I discover something even worse.  If I change the the lib_path by 
adding an additional /.. then the thing works.  That I do not 
understand.

$ bin/forex
bin/../../lib/forex/hll_forex_ca_feed
Library file found? false
$

If this is intended behaviour then I do not understand why the 
additional /.. is necessary. As it stands, if this is intended, then it 
means that writing code to work with 1.8 and 1.9 ruby that uses 
require_relative will need different relative paths to the same file.



-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.