From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2010-09-02T04:47:26+09:00
Subject: Re: why no assert_not?



On Sep 1, 2:19 am, Martin DeMello <martindeme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Test::Unit could use a built-in antonym of assert, that succeeds if
> its argument is either false or nil.

test-unit 2.x has assert_false and assert_nil if that's any help.
Actually, test-unit 1.x has assert_nil, too, I believe. You can always
add your own.

class Test::Unit::TestCase
  def assert_nil_or_false(condition)
    assert_nil(condition) && assert_false(condition)
  end
end

Regards,

Dan