From: Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Date: 2010-09-02T03:35:14+09:00
Subject: Re: why no assert_not?

On Sep 1, 8:23 am, Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Deny or Rebut would be better antonyms.

deny{} all the way.

Including many of the assert_not_yack_yack() out there should upgrade
to deny_yack_yack(). Less self-contradictory.

Also, Alex Chaffee's Wrong project has an assert{ yack yack } and
deny{ yack yack } where you write _anything_ for the yack yack, and
when it fails (or incorrectly succeeds!) it prints out all the details
of yack yack, including all intermediate variables names and their
values.

I wonder where he got the idea.

--
  Phlip
  http://flea.sourceforge.net/resume.html