From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2010-08-02T02:48:59+09:00
Subject: Re: .any?{} Behavior

Hi --

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Hal Fulton wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Hal Fulton <rubyhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Maurizio De Santis
>>> <desantis.maurizio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Josh Cheek wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Rick DeNatale
>>>>> <rick.denatale@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [].all? {|element| element != 3 }   # => true
>>>>>> There may be a better name than non_vacuous_all? but I can't think of
>>> one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> How about #appall? to imply that it is a pessimistic implementation of
>>>>> #all?
>>>>> :)
>>>
>>
>>
> Sorry, hit send by accident.
>
> How about 'every?' for the non-vacuous 'all?'?
>
> If we really need one, that is.

Or maybe "all?!" :-)


David

-- 
David A. Black, Senior Developer, Cyrus Innovation Inc.

   The                   Ruby training with Black/Brown/McAnally
   Compleat              Philadelphia, PA, October 1-2, 2010
   Rubyist               http://www.compleatrubyist.com