From: Hal Fulton <rubyhacker@...>
Date: 2010-08-02T02:25:32+09:00
Subject: Re: .any?{} Behavior

--0016e6de04c4ca9f96048cc65ef1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Hal Fulton <rubyhacker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Maurizio De Santis
>> <desantis.maurizio@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Josh Cheek wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Rick DeNatale
>> >> <rick.denatale@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> [].all? {|element| element != 3 }   # => true
>> >>> There may be a better name than non_vacuous_all? but I can't think of
>> one.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> How about #appall? to imply that it is a pessimistic implementation of
>> >> #all?
>> >> :)
>>
>
>
Sorry, hit send by accident.

How about 'every?' for the non-vacuous 'all?'?

If we really need one, that is.

Hal

--0016e6de04c4ca9f96048cc65ef1--