From: Maurizio De Santis <desantis.maurizio@...>
Date: 2010-08-02T01:28:21+09:00
Subject: Re: .any?{} Behavior

Josh Cheek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Rick DeNatale 
> <rick.denatale@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> [].all? {|element| element != 3 }   # => true
>> There may be a better name than non_vacuous_all? but I can't think of one.
>>
>>
> How about #appall? to imply that it is a pessimistic implementation of 
> #all?
> :)

I think that the best name for that method would be

def all!?(&block)
  !empty? && all?(&block)
end

It's a pity it is not permitted!

so I propose

def strict_all?(&block)
  !empty? && all?(&block)
end
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.