From: Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
Date: 2010-07-15T01:35:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Loading a module without polluting my namespace

Dreamcat Four wrote:
> Here is a fix to the require() and load() methods. Its easier to patch 
> it there and just not to assume those methods are being given relative 
> paths.

Sure, that makes sense. I'll merge that in the next release. Thanks!