From: Dreamcat Four <dreamcat4@...>
Date: 2010-07-13T17:27:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Loading a module without polluting my namespace

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
> Dreamcat Four wrote:
>> http://gist.github.com/471434
> Is it possible to simplify the example a bit? I can't tell where the

Here is the example2.rb, but modified to reproduce this scenario.

http://github.com/dreamcat4/script/commit/0a89728d

When we run the same ruby code directly (example2-no-wrapper.rb), there 
is no error. So the script wrapper is doing something differently than 
ruby would normally.

My question:
Can find a way to get around this without touching the loaded source 
code?

> missing const is actually defined.
> 
>> I noticed that there is a redefinition of require in script.rb. Is that 
>> method meant to be handling that?
>> 
>> http://redshift.sourceforge.net/script/doc/classes/Script.html#M000003
> 
> There's an example of using require with script in examples/program2.rb.
> Maybe that helps?
> 
> Sorry not to be more helpful...

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.