From: Dreamcat Four <dreamcat4@...>
Date: 2010-07-13T05:25:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Loading a module without polluting my namespace

Thanks for replying,
Will try to come back soon with an example for reproducing this.

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
> Dreamcat Four wrote:
>> http://gist.github.com/471434
> Is it possible to simplify the example a bit? I can't tell where the
> missing const is actually defined.
> 
>> I noticed that there is a redefinition of require in script.rb. Is that 
>> method meant to be handling that?
>> 
>> http://redshift.sourceforge.net/script/doc/classes/Script.html#M000003
> 
> There's an example of using require with script in examples/program2.rb.
> Maybe that helps?
> 
> Sorry not to be more helpful...

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.