From: "R.. Kumar" <sentinel1879@...>
Date: 2010-06-06T20:10:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Packaging common code with gems

Thomas Sawyer wrote:
> On Jun 6, 4:45�am, "R.. Kumar" <sentinel1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. Include these files in the gemspec (pointing to a folder outside the
>> tree)
> 
> #1 might not be so bad if you vendor them. That way there is no
> dependency but there is central management.
> 
> Otherwise #2 is a good option. #3 sounds like a very bad idea.
> 
> You might also consider, how common is common? Are these libs common
> enough that you might already find their equivalent in a support
> library like ActiveSupport or Facets? Where your common libs do not
> appear you mght even be able to contribute to those projects.
> 
>     trans.

I haven't looked at ActiveSupport. These are command line apps (not web 
stuff). These are not so common enough that Facets might have them.

I used Facets a few years back but lost touch with it. Is it 1.9 
compliant ?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.