From: Robert Dober Date: 2010-03-22T03:45:15+09:00 Subject: Re: Recommended way to install Rubygems On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/03/10 at 17:10 +0900, Ryan Davis wrote: >> >> On Mar 18, 2010, at 00:47 , Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> >> > Which parts of ruby which are currently split out would you like to see >> > installed when the user installs ruby? For example, ruby ships a ruby >> > emacs mode. Installing that would require adding a dependency on emacs, >> > which doesn't sound reasonable. >> >> That's a bullshit rationalization. > > See why I don't want to discuss this? ;-) Strange, don't you like being insulted? (1) Anyway as a (thankfull) user of Ruby and Ubuntu I vote against any preinstalled gem, that is just asking for trouble. For things like ruby-emacs should that not go into emcas rather? Cheers Robert (1) Depends by whom, I guess ;). > -- > | Lucas Nussbaum > | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | > | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | > > -- Learning without thought is labor lost; thought without learning is perilous.” --- Confucius