From: James Nathan <badlands_2004@...>
Date: 2010-03-21T11:24:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Recommended way to install Rubygems

--0-829883843-1269137859=:61167
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

i have used this program and it is all ways ziped and hard to download.

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, James Edward Gray II <james@graysoftinc.com> wrote:


From: James Edward Gray II <james@graysoftinc.com>
Subject: Re: Recommended way to install Rubygems
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:01 AM


On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> On 19/03/10 at 00:35 +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>=20
>>> Note there are not many development communities that are proud of the
>>> fact of having different, incompatible versions of the same software
>>> being widely used at the same time.
>>>=20
>>> Most other communities solve that by having more stable APIs and making
>>> sure that their important software supports the latest API.
>>=20
>>> Of course, if you want to install many different Ruby and gems versions=
,
>>> and then try to keep them in a sensible state wrt security issues (whic=
h
>>> are not that uncommon in the ruby world), that's your choice.
>>=20
>> You have lost the high ground in the civility argument.
>=20
> Why? What do you disagree with?

I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing with anything.=A0 I was pointing out that =
you yourself have stopped being civil in the quoted comments above.

James Edward Gray II
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-829883843-1269137859=:61167--